收藏 | 手机打开

The interaction between phonological information and pitch type in the processing of lexical tones at attentive stage

Keke Yu  Yuan Chen  Ruiming Wang  
【摘要】:Previous studies have revealed two types of information, acoustic and phonological information that are important for tone perception. The acoustic information refers to the physical features of lexical tones as assessed by fundamental frequency(F0), such as pitch height and pitch contour, while the phonological information means the different word meanings expressed by different tonal categories. For example, Mandarin syllable/fu/means skin when it is pronounced with Tone 1(/fu1/), but means father when it is pronounced with Tone 4(/fu4/). Though several studies in the literature have explored how these two types of information in lexical tones were processed at pre-attentive and attentive stages, most of these studies confounded the effect of phonological information with the effect of specific acoustic information, that is pitch type(pitch height and pitch contour) on the processing of lexical tones. One exception is Yu et al.,(2017), which found the interaction between phonological information and pitch type on the extent and time course of lexical tone processing at pre-attentive stage. However, it still remains unclear whether the phonological information interacts with pitch type in the attentive processing of lexical tones. Thus the present study aims to dissociate these two types of effects and further investigate the processing of lexical tones at attentive stage by event-relate potential(ERP) technique. We used real and pseudo Cantonese syllables to differentiate the phonological information from the acoustic information in lexical tones, and chose Cantonese level tones and contour tones to distinguish pitch height from pitch contour(as level tones mainly differ in pitch height while contour tones mainly differ in pitch contour). An active oddball paradigm with four types of deviant stimuli(real syllable with level tone, real syllable with contour tone, pseudo syllable with level tone, pseudo syllable with contour tone) was adopted in the experiment. The results showed significant interactions between syllable type(real vs. pseudo) and pitch type(pitch height vs. pitch contour) in the peak latency of both ERP components, N2 b and P3 b. Specifically, for both N2 b and P3 b, the peak latency of real syllable with contour tones was significantly earlier than that of pseudo syllable with contour tones, while the peak latency of real syllable with level tones was similar to that of pseudo syllable with level tones. In addition, the peak latency difference between real and pseudo syllables with level tones was significantly smaller than that between real and pseudo syllables with contour tones. But no significant interactions were found in N2 b and P3 b amplitude. The results revealed that the phonological information interacted with pitch type in the time course of lexical tone processing at the attentive stage, which was different from the findings at pre-attentive stage(Yu et al., 2017). Participants' attention and decision-making at the attentive stage may result in the different findings between attentive and pre-attentive stages. The study further provided neurophysiological evidence to the attentive processing of acoustic and phonological information in lexical tones, and contributed to the understanding of the neural mechanism of lexical tone processing.

中国期刊全文数据库 前20条
1 王媛;;A Study of Chinese Internet Language[J];校园英语;2017年30期
2 金宁;;The Literature Review of lexical Chunks Based on corpus[J];校园英语;2017年43期
3 黄远振;;英语lexical triplets反义现象[J];福建外语;1993年Z1期
4 付雪芬;程金花;;Geliable Lexical Borrowings in China English on the Internet[J];海外英语;2012年21期
5 ;Determinants of lexical access in pure-anomic recovery:a longitudinal study[J];Journal of Zhejiang University(Science B:An International Biomedicine & Biotechnology Journal);2009年05期
6 张丽昕;;An Analysis of Lexical Errors Made by Chinese Students in English Study[J];海外英语;2011年13期
7 张景京;;Lexical Semantic Ambiguity in English[J];科技信息;2010年17期
8 沈艳萍;;Agreeing and disagreeing with construction coercion[J];校园英语;2018年10期
9 温俊毅;;The Role of Lexical Phrases in Second Language Acquisition[J];海外英语;2012年01期
10 胡悦;;English Loan Words in Chinese[J];海外英语;2016年10期
11 崔淑慧;;An Analysis on Lexical Chunk and the Teaching Method[J];海外英语;2015年02期
12 Wei-Yi Ma;Peng Zhou;Stephen Crain;Li-Qun Gao;;Lexical Tones and Word Learning in Mandarin-Speaking Children at Three Years of Age(Invited paper)[J];Journal of Electronic Science and Technology;2017年01期
13 江韵;;Application of Lexical Approach to Teaching of Business English Correspondence[J];海外英语;2015年20期
14 高岩;;The Analysis of Lexical Approach in Language Teaching[J];沙洋师范高等专科学校学报;2012年02期
15 杨辉;;The Semantic Analysis of Lexical Ambiguity[J];科技信息;2012年25期
16 何晴;侯先绒;;Study on C-E Translation of Lexical Items with Chinese Characteristics in the Report on the 19th National Congress of the CPC[J];海外英语;2018年13期
17 魏烨;;On Reclassification of Verbs in Ditransitive Constructions(DC)[J];海外英语;2016年03期
18 龙军;王鲁达;李祖德;张祖平;杨柳;;Word Net-based lexical semantic classification for text corpus analysis[J];Journal of Central South University;2015年05期
19 彭秋香;;A Study on Lexical Features of Business English in HRM[J];海外英语;2013年05期
20 翟卉欣;;A Comparison of the lexical processing in Children's Word Acquisition and in Adults' Word Learning[J];中国校外教育(理论);2008年S1期
中国重要会议论文全文数据库 前10条
1 Keke Yu;Yuan Chen;Ruiming Wang;;The interaction between phonological information and pitch type in the processing of lexical tones at attentive stage[A];第二十一届全国心理学学术会议摘要集[C];2018年
2 吴君如;Yiya Chen;Vincent J van Heuven;Niels O Schiller;;Applying functional partition in the investigation of lexical tonal-pattern categories in an under-resourced Chinese dialect[A];第十四届全国人机语音通讯学术会议(NCMMSC’2017)论文集[C];2017年
3 JaneTsay;JamesMyers;;Processes In The Production Of Taiwanese Tone Sandhi:An Acoustic Phonetic Study[A];新世纪的现代语音学——第五届全国现代语音学学术会议论文集[C];2001年
4 Deborah S.Davison;;Tianjinese Tone Sandhi in Action:A Role for Stress & Metrics in Mandarin[A];第六届全国现代语音学学术会议论文集(下)[C];2003年
5 ;Semantic Interpretation of Compound Nominalization Using Bilingual Lexical Ontologies[A];第四届全国信息检索与内容安全学术会议论文集(下)[C];2008年
6 Zheng Xiang;Weichao Tu;Xinlin Li;Binbin Ni;;Understanding the Mechanisms of Radiation Belt Dropouts Observed by Van Allen Probes[A];2017中国地球科学联合学术年会论文集(四十四)——专题86:中高层大气-电离层、磁层及相互耦合过程、专题87:行星物理学、专题88:行星科学[C];2017年
7 ;Relationship between Noise,Dose,heart rate and Pitch in Cardiac dual-source CT[A];中国医师协会放射医师分会首届会员大会暨第四届医学影像山东论坛、山东省第16次放射学会议暨山东省第14届医学影像学学术研讨会论文集[C];2007年
8 Jinjie Huang;Haiyang Jia;Guangming Cheng;;Fuzzy-PI and fuzzy feedforward compound control of variable pitch system[A];第36届中国控制会议论文集(C)[C];2017年
9 郝以鑫;宗秋刚;周煦之;陈兴燃;刘鹰;傅绥燕;;Relativistic electron dynamics produced by azimuthally localized poloidal mode ULF waves: Boomerang-shaped pitch angle evolutions[A];2017中国地球科学联合学术年会论文集(三十八)——专题71:内磁层动力学、专题72:计算地球物理方法和技术、专题73:地热:“学”以致“用”、专题74:电磁卫星观测与应用[C];2017年
10 Yu Ma;Qidan Zhu;Zhibo Yang;;Fuzzy control of fast catamaran ride control system[A];第37届中国控制会议论文集(B)[C];2018年
中国博士学位论文全文数据库 前3条
1 张京鱼;操汉语的英语学习者对心理谓词的习得:语义突显层级模式[D];广东外语外贸大学;2002年
2 朱青菊;高频会话词串对英语听说能力的影响研究[D];上海外国语大学;2012年
3 桑紫林;合作产出对中国中等水平英语学习者的二语书面语发展影响研究[D];华东师范大学;2016年
中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前10条
1 陈有君;二语对一语词汇应用的影响:基于语料库的对比研究[D];南京师范大学;2018年
2 杨沙沙;英语议论文词汇和句法复杂度研究[D];广西大学;2018年
3 李玉玲;初中生英语写作中的词汇运用错误研究[D];河南师范大学;2018年
4 梁晓磊;基于语料库的中外学者期刊论文摘要中外壳名词对比研究[D];大连外国语大学;2018年
5 陈丽英;语块输入与商务英语写作相关性研究[D];广西大学;2014年
6 张璐;[D];浙江大学;2004年
7 宗文娟;词块教学法在高中英语写作教学中的运用[D];山东大学;2013年
8 胡文杰;二语词汇能力发展心理模式[D];上海师范大学;2005年
9 李强;词块理论在高中英语写作中的研究[D];河南师范大学;2014年
10 马己茹;词块在高中英语写作教学中的应用研究[D];湖南科技大学;2013年
中国重要报纸全文数据库 前1条
1 编译 王悠然;人类语言进化过程可能非常迅速[N];中国社会科学报;2015年
 快捷付款方式  订购知网充值卡  订购热线  帮助中心
  • 400-819-9993
  • 010-62982499
  • 010-62783978